    Un dieu donne le feu
     Pour faire l'enfer;
    Un diable, le miel
   Pour faire le ciel.

TRACTATUS PARADOXICO-PHILOSOPHICUS

9	Nervous system: consider one or more closed organizations that intersect with a living organism and its cognitive domain, expanding it.
9.1	A logical observer distinguishes the nervous system only within the living organism and interprets sensory surfaces and effector surfaces as “inputs” to and “outputs” from the nervous system that match “outputs” from and “inputs” to a world “out there”.
9.2	A paradoxical observer interacts with and tentatively distinguishes the activity of the nervous system as “nerve” impulses that encode only “how much” not “what” the living organism “perceives”.
9.21	Since everything “perceived” translates into nerve impulses, the nervous system does not discriminate (distinguish) between impulses coming from an “outside” world and those originated “within” the nervous system (“inside” or “outside” blend into “inside and outside”).
9.22	For this same observer, the encounter with other observers triggers the invention of a tentative world “in and out there”.
9.23	While some of these observers adjust, share, and thus “confirm”, tentatively the invention, others do not.

10	Environment: logical observers distinguish the intersection of their cognitive domains as a common dwelling and call it their environment.
10.1	The distinction of an environment appears to these observers as an invitation to extract or deduce further distinctions.
10.12	These further distinctions appear to these observers as processes (events in time) that produce components (objects in space) forming open networks of processes and components that exclude these and other observers.
10.2	Language and communication emerge in this way from the activity (of processes) in the nervous system and thus, the logical observer invents a world “out there” independent of the observers.
10.3	Since processes, components, open networks of processes and components, and an environment neither define nor maintain themselves, logical observers may only distinguish (extricate or deduce) them from organizationally closed unities (paradoxical context), which will appear open and no longer organizationally closed (nor paradoxical) for these observers.
10.4	Paradoxical observers interact with and tentatively distinguish an environment as a world “in and out there”, through which they may, with some difficulty, relate to logical observers.